Elektron Octatrack Mk1 🧻🧻

Update August ’21

After much to-ing and fro-ing and watching of videos I went and bought an old Octatrack Mk1, even though I decided against it as my live stage tool. Very glad I did – the MPC is great on tour. But I was intrigued by this one’s workflow which seems akin to tape loop editing. There’s a new Octatrack Mk2 on sale, prettier than this 8-year-old model – who cares, I saved a thousand dollars. It sounds the same.

Let’s first address a bevy of videos that ask, “which is better? The MPC or the Octatrack?” I’m looking forward to their follow up videos, “which is better? A Hammer or Bees?” “Which is my left foot?” “How is string?”

They have nothing in common, the question is inane. If you must contrast then here’s the decider – when you play the piano, do you use more than one finger at a time? If so the MPC is the only choice, the Octatrack has no polyphony, or concept of it. The Octatrack is, for all its fancy pants, just a rhythm box. A very heavy but little box, all metal, straight lines and circles.

Being a rhythm box, descendent of the TR808, it has 16 little buttons along the bottom and lights that strobe along them. Push the buttons and place kicks and snares and high hats – all very familiar drum machine stuff. This is the conceptual base on which all else is built – with implications, good and bad. These trigger points are called trigs which combine with locks, timed adjustments of the sound. A lock can be a wide set of parameters including the playback speed, pitch shift, mix, sample region … and so on.

A simple use – to set the lock for each drum trig so they are pitched and panned and reverbed individually. More complex – to trig a longer sample that spills over the duration of the phrase, and apply these locks to sections of it, perhaps scrubbing sections of it forward and reverse in time with the beat. More complex again – to have other band member’s sound input into the pattern, for captured live sounds to intersect with the sampled sounds.

I started to use it the way I’ve used multitrack tape loops – punching in radio sounds and snippets of noise in real time. The ‘bowing’ of the sound is very much like tape, although the pitch shifting is obviously digital. But you are never too far away from the underlying grain of the thing – the 16 events per bar of the drum machine. If you automate the pitch gradually up over a phrase – it will noticeably step on each underlying lock.

It’s a fair price to pay given that this is an instrument for performance. You are able to see where the locks are set, add and remove them, change their settings, all in real time as the pattern is playing. It’s as if you cut and splice tape as it loops through the recorder. At any point you can save the overall result as a scene. There is a cross fader at the right which swipes between any two scenes, so it’s a simple thing to get something nice, set it, swipe over to another scene, set that and so on, and then sweep back and forward between all the ‘cool moments’ you’ve managed to discover. The first time you sweep between the ‘tape’ running forward and backward and it sounds just like a tape being bowed across the heads, you’ll respect what the Octatrack is all about.

Garbage in Garbage Out

I attempted a tape metaphor that’s familiar to me. But each operator is going to use their own – playing vinyl, live jamming – whatever. If you put simple drum machine sounds into this you will not get much, and so the real decider is what source material you can find. For the MPC I’m putting in textures and melodic elements I can play with a keyboard. That won’t work here. Instead I tried choir loops (not so great) and odd rhythmic elements (worked better).

Do you like loops? Good. Do you like melodic progressions? Not so good. Even the clever bald dude that demos the unit online tends to get a groove and just fuss that around. It is just a rhythm machine and you will need other toys to provide the actual music. And to be honest it’s very difficult to work with the tiny display on this machine. The information is cryptic as is the terminology used. The tactile controls are very good but unless you are a live performer there are much easier ways to create a similar sound.

There comes a point where you realise there’s a lot of arcane button pushing and terminology for something you thought was going to be organic and flowing. I did not intend to learn a 16 trigger violin, and became bored with the terminology and shift keying. I was not enjoying it.

It was sold.

1 comment

  1. Bought myself an Octatrack MKII for screaming good deal last year.
    I own a lot of Elektron products and they seem to be well built, high quality and intuitive.
    The Octratrack is the odd duck.
    It is not intuitive. I’ve been banging on it for months and I still can’t do some things it is supposed to do.
    All of the video tutorials I find are geared towards DJ style use. So they have this contrivance of moving their hands around in a dramatic jerky fashion when doing things. Making it impossible to ascertain what they just did. But they looked cool as heck doing it!
    It works perfectly well as a sequencer and drum machine if thats all you want to do.
    But I have a thing that I like to find and exploit the native strength of an instrument.
    My Ovation Magnum bass has a pathetic wimpy sound played into a clean amplifier.
    But when you light it up with good overdrive box it sounds like the burning cross of Constantine.
    I’ve yet to get past the mundane uses of the Octatrack and exploit its intrinsic strengths/weaknesses.
    I’m going to marinate for a while longer. I kind of hated the Analog 4 at first, then I discovered how to really use the filters and the modulation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *